<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What It Means When Your Reviewer is Mean, Unfair, and Totally Doesn’t Get It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://juliewuauthor.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=18597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://juliewuauthor.com/?p=18597</link>
	<description>Author</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Di Eats the Elephant</title>
		<link>http://juliewuauthor.com/?p=18597#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Di Eats the Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondthemargins.com/?p=18597#comment-138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this honest assessment, Julie.  I had a co-groupie tell me I was overly critical of his piece, and have been trying to learn to do critiques in groups that provide something useful to the one whose work is being critiqued.  It&#039;s hard to know &#039;on a dime&#039; what stage everyone is in and where they are going.  I usually see the flaws first and in some pieces (after 4 pages of writing the same thing over and over, for example, a longer write-up that essential addresses show v. tell), I figure they&#039;re as tired of listening to my comments as I am of reading the piece.  If it&#039;s outside my genre, I may stop there because I obviously can&#039;t help them with everything since I don&#039;t read their genre enough.  If they&#039;re in my genre, I may look to see how they build suspense, etc.  I know that I want my writers groups to help me better my writing, but I also want it to zoom off the page and smack some agent/editor/publisher awake and get them excited, and if the group isn&#039;t hard on me - doesn&#039;t hold me to the standards of Coben, Deaver, Evanovich, Grafton, Childs - then I won&#039;t ever be able to get that high.  Or as high as I possibly can.  Then again, I&#039;ve always been an overachiever in other things (not here, lol) and want to aim as high as possible, knowing I won&#039;t hit the mark, but getting closer than if I had aimed lower.  I&#039;ve got a long way to go.  Any suggestions on how to see the positive over the negative first would be greatly appreciated.  In the meantime, I&#039;ll keep stepping back and looking for it, so I can open with it, and I&#039;ll read this post again to help me keep my perspective.  Thanks for a tough post.  I know I needed it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this honest assessment, Julie.  I had a co-groupie tell me I was overly critical of his piece, and have been trying to learn to do critiques in groups that provide something useful to the one whose work is being critiqued.  It&#8217;s hard to know &#8216;on a dime&#8217; what stage everyone is in and where they are going.  I usually see the flaws first and in some pieces (after 4 pages of writing the same thing over and over, for example, a longer write-up that essential addresses show v. tell), I figure they&#8217;re as tired of listening to my comments as I am of reading the piece.  If it&#8217;s outside my genre, I may stop there because I obviously can&#8217;t help them with everything since I don&#8217;t read their genre enough.  If they&#8217;re in my genre, I may look to see how they build suspense, etc.  I know that I want my writers groups to help me better my writing, but I also want it to zoom off the page and smack some agent/editor/publisher awake and get them excited, and if the group isn&#8217;t hard on me &#8211; doesn&#8217;t hold me to the standards of Coben, Deaver, Evanovich, Grafton, Childs &#8211; then I won&#8217;t ever be able to get that high.  Or as high as I possibly can.  Then again, I&#8217;ve always been an overachiever in other things (not here, lol) and want to aim as high as possible, knowing I won&#8217;t hit the mark, but getting closer than if I had aimed lower.  I&#8217;ve got a long way to go.  Any suggestions on how to see the positive over the negative first would be greatly appreciated.  In the meantime, I&#8217;ll keep stepping back and looking for it, so I can open with it, and I&#8217;ll read this post again to help me keep my perspective.  Thanks for a tough post.  I know I needed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Wu</title>
		<link>http://juliewuauthor.com/?p=18597#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondthemargins.com/?p=18597#comment-137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Leslie!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Leslie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Greffenius</title>
		<link>http://juliewuauthor.com/?p=18597#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Greffenius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondthemargins.com/?p=18597#comment-136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wonderful, sage, honest and funny piece, Julie. (You described what projection is very well, too.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful, sage, honest and funny piece, Julie. (You described what projection is very well, too.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Wu</title>
		<link>http://juliewuauthor.com/?p=18597#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondthemargins.com/?p=18597#comment-135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Kathy!  I didn&#039;t really think you worried about Bristol Meyers Squibb.  Does anyone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Kathy!  I didn&#8217;t really think you worried about Bristol Meyers Squibb.  Does anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Wu</title>
		<link>http://juliewuauthor.com/?p=18597#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondthemargins.com/?p=18597#comment-134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nichole, stop giving me nightmares.  I&#039;m shivering.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nichole, stop giving me nightmares.  I&#8217;m shivering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
